What Was the Name of That Movie? Part 1 - Discussion. O. P. Need help identifying a movie that you just can't remember the name of? Here's the place to ask. As always, Google first, but if you have no luck searching on your own, some of the WP movie buffs may be able to help out.

BUT here's what i can remember - -- -probably during the 2nd half or late 8. Messiah- like storyand the most important of all was the movie title – it was an ANAGRAM.. NOT really an English word BUt once you arranged the letters or reversed it – it becomes a normal English word or words or something that we know of.. JUST could NOT remember the title.. Don't know if anyone can help here, but I was up late one night earlier this week in Townsville (not sure which night actually) and was watching this cheesy old B movie about a dentist who fakes his own death and takes his dead twin's identity.. CIA agent. I know what you're thinking.."Sounds Super!"lol Anyway, at the ad breaks it was advertising the film as 'Consequences', but I have not been able to find it anywhere. I'm trying to find the name of the lead actor.

Any help would be appreciated. Thank you very much!!!! God I love Whirlpool and Whirlpoolians! Cheers. Benjamin Button writes..# probably during the 2nd half or late 8. Messiah- like story. This is all I could find in reference to your request.

Made in 1. 98. 8, and the storyline follows the above, except the title isn't an anagram."Adapted from an Appalachian Jack Tale set in the late 1. World War II veteran named Jack who, in return for an act of kindness, receives two magical gifts: a sack that can catch anything and a jar that can show whether a sick person will recover or die. Jack becomes a national hero when he rescues the president's daughter from a serious illness by capturing Death in his magic sack. However, after many years without Death in the world, Jack realizes that he has upset the natural order and releases Death to save humankind from perpetual old age and misery."recall. Jedi. Knight writes.. This is all I could find in reference to your request. BUT that is NOT the one..

HOWEVER i raised this issue with some drinking buddies early this month.. Emanon (1. 98. 7)..

NONAME if reversed.! I've got one that I'd love to know what it is. The main plot of the story is that terrorists hijack a plane. I can't remember all the details, however some of the main features are: 1. That a stealth plane docks onto the underside of the hijacked jet. People then unload from the stealth plane and board the hijacked aircraft. Their objective is to then disable a bomb that is on the plane.

They find the bomb, but the first one is a fake, the real one is further in and protected by red lasers. In one scene before the us Air force is about to destroy the hijacked plane, one of the pilots notices that the tail lights are flashing in Morse code, they then decide not to blow the plane up, and give it more time. I think it then goes on to them landing the hijacked plane at an airport, but the two pilots are dead, so the main character must then land the plane. He then spies an airstrip that he is familiar with, so he aims for that. Watch Inherit The Wind Hindi Full Movie. As he lands he wipes out about 5. In the end everyone jumps out of the plane and all is swell again. Can anyone please tell me the name of this film?

It's been on TV a couple of times, but many years ago. Thanks in advanced. Matt. Nikolai Luzhin writes.. Executive Decision (1.

Yes That's It!!!! Thank you so much, I must go and buy this movie, it's fantastic. Thanks for the real quick reply, I was thinking that it would take a while.

Matt. Posted from another thread: I saw it on SBS a while ago, sometime last year probably. From what I remember, it was in French.

A French girl (early 2. Japan. She struggled with the language, to come to terms with Japanese customs and working conditions, and ended up doing strange things like sleeping in the office.

She had poor relationships with her bosses except the CEO, who seemed to 'accept' her. It was a brilliant movie. A really simple plot but very moving and acting was great from what I remember. Sorry for such a vague description, I'd love to watch it again but no idea what it was called. Jotunheim writes.. It was a brilliant movie. A really simple plot but very movinghmmm..

Stupeur et tremblements (2. English title of Fear and Trembling..

BUT the girl in the story is Belgian though.. French actress..: )That's the one, many thanks : )Hi,This one is probably a bit more difficult. I have seen this on German TV in the end 7. Story is about a woman having an car accident in bad weather where she dies – the story continues with her being in a twilight reality where she lives on. Similar to Beetlejuce /The 6th Sense/ The Others. Watch Outbreak Online (2017) on this page.

I believed this movie was directed by the french film maker Claude Cabrol. I searched his movies but unable to find it.

Anyone know this movie? Tonight. We. Dine. In. Hell writes..

Update 8/5/17 7:25pm ET: Google’s new Vice President of Diversity, Integrity & Governance Danielle Brown has issued her own memo to Google employees in response to. Compulsive lying disorder, also known as pseudologia fantastica or mythomania, is a condition that describes the behavior of a habitual liar. While compulsive.

Alice Ou La Dernière Fugue (1. Wow.. yes that's the one.. Ok here's one for you to figure out. I saw it on TV in the 1. I remember people digging and they either found aliens in the ground, or were having hallucination about them.. I remember one scene where you see all of these sort of big grasshopper things all hopping along on their hind legs..

Really freaked me out as a child. Any thoughts on that one???? Miss. Muffitt writes..

BEFORE i go on a wild goose chase.. HOW do you qualify those "aliens".. ETs.. or just look- alike as perceived by a child then.. HOW significant are the grasshoppers in the movie as a plot device.? BE MORE than that.. NOT a TV show episode.!: )Tonight.

We. Dine. In. Hell writes.. BEFORE i go on a wild goose chase.. HOW do you qualify those "aliens"..

We have told you not to stare at the Sun today. We have told you to use safety glasses. We have tried so very hard, and we are so very tired. A lie is a statement used intentionally for the purpose of deception. The practice of communicating lies is called lying, and a person who communicates a lie may be.

ETs.. or just look- alike as perceived by a child then.. HOW significant is the grasshopper in the movie as a plot device.?

BE MORE than that.. I think it might have been in England and they were digging a tunnel and found a "Space ship" buried there. I remember dream sequences of the alien "Grasshoppers" hundreds of them hopping along, might have been a war.

It's a very long time since I saw it, racking the old brain for memories!! I think that the people who found the ship sort of got mental picture of this "War"Edit: as for the size of the "Alien grasshoppers" I would say about 4 or 5 feet tall. Miss. Muffitt writes.. England and they were digging a tunnel and found a "Space ship" buried therehmmmm.. Brit horror movie about some interplanetary archaeologists..

BUT was released in early 8. Nope sorry not the right one. But I might have to find that movie and have a watch : -)I would think I was about 1. So if it was on TV it might have been made in the late 6. BUt then there is another Brit film called - -- where some construction workers unearth some sort of an alien spacecraft beneath London.. Refractor writes..

Quartermass and the Pit?: D : D : Dyou are still awake TONIGHT.! BUT it's ALL good. Apologies to the OP for OFF- Topics..! O. P. Tonight. We. Dine. In. Hell writes.. TONIGHT.! Yep, gotta be wide awake to beat you to the mark with an obscure movie.

Refractor writes.. Quartermass and the Pit? That sure looks like it.. Now I have to try to find it and watch it again : -) see if it's still scary. Refractor writes.. NEXT time..: D : D : DMiss.

Muffitt writes.. watch it again : ) see if it's still scary. THAT is ONE SICK movie even IF the special effects were of the 6. Inseminoid was gross.. Aliens.. jusy keep away from spiders though.. DNot a bad memory hey.. I used to sneak out after mum and dad had gone to bed and watch these on the old TV sitting about 2 feet from the screen with the sound down low..

LOLAlso loved "Night stalker" with Darren Mcgavin. What's the name of this Indian drama movie? It was released recently (1- 3 years ago), featuring interconnecting relationshipsamong urban young professionals set in modern Mumbai. It's a "serious" movie and doesn't include any Bollywood- type dancing and music. What's the name of that movie with Ants? A long time ago (probably 3. I saw a movie on TV that involved ants.

Here's The Full 1. Page Anti- Diversity Screed Circulating Internally at Google [Updated]Update 8/5/1. ET: Google’s new Vice President of Diversity, Integrity & Governance Danielle Brown has issued her own memo to Google employees in response to the now- viral memo, “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber.” Brown’s statement, obtained by Motherboard, can be found in full at the end of this article. A software engineer’s 1. Google’s diversity initiatives is going viral inside the company, being shared on an internal meme network and Google+. The document’s existence was first reported by Motherboard, and Gizmodo has obtained it in full.

In the memo, which is the personal opinion of a male Google employee and is titled “Google’s Ideological Echo Chamber,” the author argues that women are underrepresented in tech not because they face bias and discrimination in the workplace, but because of inherent psychological differences between men and women. We need to stop assuming that gender gaps imply sexism,” he writes, going on to argue that Google’s educational programs for young women may be misguided.

The post comes as Google battles a wage discrimination investigation by the US Department of Labor, which has found that Google routinely pays women less than men in comparable roles. Gizmodo has reached out to Google for comment on the memo and how the company is addressing employee concerns regarding its content. We will update this article if we hear back. The text of the post is reproduced in full below, with some minor formatting modifications. Two charts and several hyperlinks are also omitted. Reply to public response and misrepresentation. I value diversity and inclusion, am not denying that sexism exists, and don’t endorse using stereotypes.

When addressing the gap in representation in the population, we need to look at population level differences in distributions. If we can’t have an honest discussion about this, then we can never truly solve the problem. Psychological safety is built on mutual respect and acceptance, but unfortunately our culture of shaming and misrepresentation is disrespectful and unaccepting of anyone outside its echo chamber. Despite what the public response seems to have been, I’ve gotten many personal messages from fellow Googlers expressing their gratitude for bringing up these very important issues which they agree with but would never have the courage to say or defend because of our shaming culture and the possibility of being fired. This needs to change. TL: DRGoogle’s political bias has equated the freedom from offense with psychological safety, but shaming into silence is the antithesis of psychological safety.

This silencing has created an ideological echo chamber where some ideas are too sacred to be honestly discussed. The lack of discussion fosters the most extreme and authoritarian elements of this ideology. Extreme: all disparities in representation are due to oppression. Authoritarian: we should discriminate to correct for this oppression. Differences in distributions of traits between men and women may in part explain why we don’t have 5. Discrimination to reach equal representation is unfair, divisive, and bad for business. Background [1]People generally have good intentions, but we all have biases which are invisible to us.

Thankfully, open and honest discussion with those who disagree can highlight our blind spots and help us grow, which is why I wrote this document.[2] Google has several biases and honest discussion about these biases is being silenced by the dominant ideology. What follows is by no means the complete story, but it’s a perspective that desperately needs to be told at Google. Google’s biases. At Google, we talk so much about unconscious bias as it applies to race and gender, but we rarely discuss our moral biases. Political orientation is actually a result of deep moral preferences and thus biases. Considering that the overwhelming majority of the social sciences, media, and Google lean left, we should critically examine these prejudices. Watch Two Men In Town Online (2017).

Left Biases. Compassion for the weak. Disparities are due to injustices. Humans are inherently cooperative. Change is good (unstable) Open. Idealist. Right Biases. Respect for the strong/authority. Disparities are natural and just.

Humans are inherently competitive. Change is dangerous (stable)Closed.

Pragmatic. Neither side is 1. A company too far to the right may be slow to react, overly hierarchical, and untrusting of others. In contrast, a company too far to the left will constantly be changing (deprecating much loved services), over diversify its interests (ignoring or being ashamed of its core business), and overly trust its employees and competitors.

Only facts and reason can shed light on these biases, but when it comes to diversity and inclusion, Google’s left bias has created a politically correct monoculture that maintains its hold by shaming dissenters into silence. This silence removes any checks against encroaching extremist and authoritarian policies. For the rest of this document, I’ll concentrate on the extreme stance that all differences in outcome are due to differential treatment and the authoritarian element that’s required to actually discriminate to create equal representation. Possible non- bias causes of the gender gap in tech [3]At Google, we’re regularly told that implicit (unconscious) and explicit biases are holding women back in tech and leadership.

Of course, men and women experience bias, tech, and the workplace differently and we should be cognizant of this, but it’s far from the whole story. On average, men and women biologically differ in many ways. These differences aren’t just socially constructed because: They’re universal across human cultures. They often have clear biological causes and links to prenatal testosterone.

Biological males that were castrated at birth and raised as females often still identify and act like males. The underlying traits are highly heritable. They’re exactly what we would predict from an evolutionary psychology perspective. Note, I’m not saying that all men differ from women in the following ways or that these differences are “just.” I’m simply stating that the distribution of preferences and abilities of men and women differ in part due to biological causes and that these differences may explain why we don’t see equal representation of women in tech and leadership. Many of these differences are small and there’s significant overlap between men and women, so you can’t say anything about an individual given these population level distributions. Personality differences.

Women, on average, have more: Openness directed towards feelings and aesthetics rather than ideas. Women generally also have a stronger interest in people rather than things, relative to men (also interpreted as empathizing vs.

These two differences in part explain why women relatively prefer jobs in social or artistic areas. More men may like coding because it requires systemizing and even within SWEs, comparatively more women work on front end, which deals with both people and aesthetics.

Extraversion expressed as gregariousness rather than assertiveness. Also, higher agreeableness. This leads to women generally having a harder time negotiating salary, asking for raises, speaking up, and leading. Note that these are just average differences and there’s overlap between men and women, but this is seen solely as a women’s issue. This leads to exclusory programs like Stretch and swaths of men without support.

Neuroticism (higher anxiety, lower stress tolerance). This may contribute to the higher levels of anxiety women report on Googlegeist and to the lower number of women in high stress jobs.